February 22, 2021

Question

Currently, the federal government does not use data directly provided by WA in its PCR testing dataset (accessible here: https://healthdata.gov/dataset/covid-19-diagnostic-laboratory-testing-pcr-testing-time-series), as it does for most jurisdictions. Instead, it uses data submitted directly by laboratories in WA, which appears to be incomplete data—about 26% lower than WA's test count on its dashboard.

Does WA submit any COVID-19 testing data to the federal government, either in aggregate or at the line level? If so, do you know why the CDC and HHS do not use WA's submitted data in public datasets? If not, why doesn’t WA submit data to the federal government?

January 29, 2021

Question

Two weeks ago, South Carolina released a full, facility-level data page of vaccination in Long Term Care centers: https://cvshealth.com/sites/default/files/cvs-health-covid-19-vaccination-data.pdf. Since South Carolina released facility-level vaccination data in LTC, we believe every state likely has the same access to this data. Is this true for Washington? Can you provide facility-level data of vaccine distribution to long-term-care facilities on your website?

Answers

January 29, 2021

Answered by

We are not sharing facility-level data for any type of facility at this time.

February 3, 2021

Answered by

We don't share facility-level data out of privacy concerns. However, total long-term care doses can be found on our dashboard (https://www.doh.wa.gov/Emergencies/COVID19/DataDashboard)

January 25, 2021

Question

We noticed a conflict between two notes on your data dashboard page (https://www.doh.wa.gov/Emergencies/COVID19/DataDashboard) with regard to how Washington reports COVID deaths. Within the dashboard, there is some text stating "Probable cases are individuals with a positive antigen test for COVID-19..." and "Hospitalizations and deaths are reported among confirmed and probable cases." This led us to believe that a positive molecular or antigen test was required in order for a death to be counted as a COVID death. But at the bottom of the same page, there is text stating: "As of December 10, 2020, death counts on our dashboard reflect those... where the cause of death was confirmed or suspected to have been COVID-19..." The presence of the word "suspected" here indicates to us that a positive antigen test is not necessary for a death to count as a COVID death. Could you please clarify?

Answer

January 25, 2021

Answered by

While the notes probably aren’t worded quite right, the upshot is that the dashboard is correct.

We report confirmed and suspected deaths to confirmed and probable cases. There are different definitions for deaths and cases.

December 13, 2020

Question

What is the current criteria for a death being counted in the ‘Deaths’ column?

Answer

December 13, 2020

Answered by

Confirmed, Suspect, and Pending/Missing COVID-19 deaths are reported on our DOH dashboard and updated every working day

December 13, 2020

Question

Does Washington currently have data on each of the four COVID-19 death classifications mentioned above?

Answer

December 13, 2020

Answered by

In July, we published a detailed COVID-19 preliminary death data report that broke down some of the different categories of COVID-19 deaths and provides more detailed definitions. Link to report: https://www.doh.wa.gov/Newsroom/Articles/ID/1289/Washington-State-Department-of-Health-publishes-detailed-COVID-19-preliminary-death-data-report

December 13, 2020

Question

How are you planning on making the process of reporting deaths better?

Answer

December 13, 2020

Answered by

Next week, we plan to announce and implement a number of changes to ensure we are reporting out on COVID-19 deaths in an easily understandable way that is as accurate as possible. Please watch for our newsroom page for more detail. Link to newsroom page: https://www.doh.wa.gov/Newsroom

November 18, 2020

Question

Data about antigen-positive COVID cases as of September 30, 2020

Answer

November 18, 2020

Answered by

See attached file

November 10, 2020

Question

I noticed on your website that the Total COVID-19 Patients Hospitalized table seems to include the totals from both confirmed and suspected cases. I’ve attached a picture of the table here. Which two columns were you referring to when you said to add the columns?

Answer

November 10, 2020

Answered by

You’re right that both confirmed and suspected cases hospitalized are combined and displayed under “Hospitalizations and ventilations.” No need to add two columns, as we thought.

November 9, 2020

Question

We were hoping to get clarification on WA’s definition for a current COVID hospitalization. Your website states that the total includes patients with confirmed and suspected cases. Is this still accurate?

Answer

November 9, 2020

Answered by

Washington state continues to track both suspected and positive (confirmed) COVID patients in our hospitals. We receive these data from hospitals and display them in separate columns on our dashboards. The numbers you’ve provided seem to be for COVID positive cases only; for the total number of COVID suspected and positive patients in Washington hospitals, you’d need to add these columns.

Hospitals in Washington state are required to report metrics on their bed capacity and occupancy, critical staffing needs, equipment, and PPE supplies to the state every day using the WA HEALTH data system. This requirement is separate from (and in addition to) hospital reporting requirements for the federal government. Hospital staff manually input these data each day. This work is often done by frontline staff who already have very limited time available, so some variances may result.

November 9, 2020

Question

Why do your numbers for hospitalizations differ from the HHS?

Answer

November 9, 2020

Answered by

Hospitals in our state have reported directly to HHS since July, however we’re now working to be able to upload these data to HHS on their behalf. This should reduce variances between federal and state data platforms as well as the burden on hospital staff. However, the timing of reporting by both WA HEALTH and HHS can also cause some differences in the data.

November 9, 2020

Question

There is a persistent (but small) difference between the Total Tests number on the Current Status tab and the sum of all the tests shown on the Testing tab. (calculated using the CSV download available on that tab). A similar difference exists for “confirmed cases” vs. positive tests. What is the reason for these differences?

Answer

November 9, 2020

Answered by

The testing data we display in the DOH dashboard includes data as of January 16, 2020. However, the data available for download from the same page includes data as of February 29, 2020. This explains the minor difference between these two sources.

November 9, 2020

Question

Can you provide me some information about Washington's antigen testing?

Answer

November 9, 2020

Answered by

See attached file

July 17, 2020

Question

Is Washington performing pool testing?

Answer

July 17, 2020

Answered by

Not at this time. A couple labs (UW and NW Pathology) have trialed it, but none are using this at this time.

July 17, 2020

Question

How is this testing reported? (pools)

Answer

July 17, 2020

Answered by

If done for diagnosis it would be reported like all others positive, negative or indeterminant.

July 17, 2020

Question

Are they conducting antigen testing? Are these testing results reported on the state site?

Answer

July 17, 2020

Answered by

Yes, but not pooling. We are not actively tracking or reporting on antigen testing at this time. However, if a lab collects it and reports it, it would go into our electronic system. Any of that preliminary data, without proper review, would be incomplete, inaccurate, and not helpful in producing worthwhile analysis.

July 17, 2020

Question

How many tests have they conducted?

Answer

July 17, 2020

Answered by

From pooling? None that we have been made aware of. Without a system in place to ensure we are capturing the full scope of antigen testing taking place, any data we may have captured would be highly preliminary, incomplete, and therefore not useful. (Reporter note: I had sent this with the antigen question, but they separated out the follow-up questions.)