Mississippi

Date Number Title
February 10, 2021, 9:22 PM PST 1095 [MS] Clear Positive Antibody Tests timeseries
February 10, 2021, 9:22 PM PST 1095 [MS] Clear Positive Antibody Tests timeseries
January 8, 2021, 1:51 PM PST 1055 [MS] Patch 01/07 late update
January 8, 2021, 1:51 PM PST 1055 [MS] Patch 01/07 late update
November 10, 2020, 10:09 AM PST 944 [MS] Patch 11/8 Cur. hosp, cur. icu, and cur. vent
September 27, 2020, 6:04 PM PDT 870 [MS] Missing value for Total Tests (PCR) on 5/17
September 18, 2020, 7:06 AM PDT 846 [MS] Probables Backfill and Confirmed Cases Corrections
September 11, 2020, 2:17 PM PDT 825 [MS] Backfill Cur. Hosp, Cur. icu from 8/24-9/10. Delete cur. vent from 8/30 - 9/10
July 31, 2020, 7:40 AM PDT 712 [MS] Historical PCL Cases
July 17, 2020, 3:58 PM PDT 643 [MS] Negatives dropped on 7/8
July 8, 2020, 1:21 PM PDT 586 [MS] data entry mistake from 7/8
July 1, 2020, 1:04 PM PDT 563 [MS] 6/30 total test numbers were used instead of PCR tests only
June 25, 2020, 8:24 AM PDT 535 [MS] Total Tests (PCR) and Negative Cases were entered incorrectly on 6/23
May 31, 2020, 11:14 AM PDT 469 [MS Historicals]antibody tests were added to total for one day
May 3, 2020, 2:32 PM PDT 350 [MS - Mississippi] Update "current hospitalized" for 5/2 datapoint
April 21, 2020, 2:23 AM PDT 244 MS has an B grade with wild swings
April 3, 2020, 2:29 AM PDT 130 MS: Governor reporting much higher test numbers

#1095: [MS] Clear Positive Antibody Tests timeseries

Issue number 1095

hmhoffman opened this issue on February 10, 2021, 9:22 PM PST

Open in Github

State: MS

Dates affected: 05/21/20 - 02/10/21

Describe the issue: From May 21, 2020 through May 26, 2020, we briefly captured Mississippi's Positive antibody tests (specimens) through state press conferences. After May 26, 2020, Mississippi no longer reported new data for this metric and we carried it over. On February 11, 2021, we cleared Mississippi's Positive antibody tests (specimens) timeseries to ensure that our data is as accurate and consistent as possible.

Comments

hmhoffman commented on February 10, 2021, 9:23 PM PST
Open in Github

Rows edited: 265 MS 2021-02-09 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-02-08 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-02-07 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-02-06 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-02-05 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-02-04 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-02-03 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-02-02 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-02-01 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-01-31 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-01-30 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-01-29 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-01-28 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-01-27 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-01-26 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-01-25 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-01-24 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-01-23 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-01-22 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-01-21 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-01-20 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-01-19 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-01-18 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-01-17 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-01-16 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-01-15 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-01-14 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-01-13 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-01-12 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-01-11 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-01-10 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-01-09 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-01-08 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-01-07 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-01-06 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-01-05 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-01-04 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-01-03 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-01-02 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-01-01 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-12-31 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-12-30 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-12-29 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-12-28 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-12-27 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-12-26 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-12-25 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-12-24 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-12-23 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-12-22 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-12-21 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-12-20 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-12-19 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-12-18 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-12-17 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-12-16 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-12-15 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-12-14 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-12-13 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-12-12 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-12-11 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-12-10 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-12-09 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-12-08 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-12-07 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-12-06 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-12-05 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-12-04 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-12-03 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-12-02 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-12-01 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-11-30 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-11-29 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-11-28 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-11-27 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-11-26 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-11-25 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-11-24 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-11-23 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-11-22 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-11-21 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-11-20 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-11-19 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-11-18 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-11-17 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-11-16 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-11-15 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-11-14 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-11-13 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-11-12 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-11-11 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-11-10 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-11-09 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-11-08 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-11-07 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-11-06 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-11-05 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-11-04 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-11-03 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-11-02 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-11-01 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-10-31 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-10-30 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-10-29 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-10-28 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-10-27 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-10-26 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-10-25 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-10-24 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-10-23 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-10-22 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-10-21 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-10-20 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-10-19 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-10-18 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-10-17 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-10-16 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-10-15 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-10-14 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-10-13 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-10-12 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-10-11 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-10-10 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-10-09 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-10-08 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-10-07 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-10-06 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-10-05 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-10-04 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-10-03 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-10-02 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-10-01 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-09-30 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-09-29 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-09-28 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-09-27 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-09-26 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-09-25 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-09-24 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-09-23 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-09-22 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-09-21 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-09-20 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-09-19 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-09-18 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-09-17 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-09-16 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-09-15 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-09-14 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-09-13 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-09-12 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-09-11 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-09-10 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-09-09 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-09-08 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-09-07 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-09-06 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-09-05 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-09-04 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-09-03 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-09-02 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-09-01 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-08-31 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-08-30 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-08-29 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-08-28 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-08-27 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-08-26 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-08-25 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-08-24 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-08-23 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-08-22 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-08-21 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-08-20 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-08-19 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-08-18 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-08-17 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-08-16 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-08-15 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-08-14 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-08-13 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-08-12 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-08-11 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-08-10 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-08-09 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-08-08 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-08-07 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-08-06 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-08-05 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-08-04 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-08-03 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-08-02 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-08-01 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-07-31 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-07-30 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-07-29 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-07-28 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-07-27 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-07-26 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-07-25 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-07-24 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-07-23 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-07-22 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-07-21 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-07-20 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-07-19 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-07-18 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-07-17 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-07-16 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-07-15 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-07-14 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-07-13 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-07-12 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-07-11 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-07-10 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-07-09 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-07-08 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-07-07 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-07-06 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-07-05 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-07-04 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-07-03 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-07-02 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-07-01 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-06-30 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-06-29 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-06-28 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-06-27 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-06-26 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-06-25 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-06-24 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-06-23 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-06-22 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-06-21 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-06-20 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-06-19 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-06-18 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-06-17 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-06-16 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-06-15 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-06-14 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-06-13 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-06-12 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-06-11 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-06-10 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-06-09 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-06-08 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-06-07 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-06-06 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-06-05 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-06-04 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-06-03 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-06-02 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-06-01 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-05-31 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-05-30 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-05-29 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-05-28 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-05-27 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-05-26 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-05-25 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 80) MS 2020-05-24 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 80) MS 2020-05-23 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 80) MS 2020-05-22 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 80) MS 2020-05-21 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 80)

#1095: [MS] Clear Positive Antibody Tests timeseries

Issue number 1095

hmhoffman opened this issue on February 10, 2021, 9:22 PM PST

Open in Github

State: MS

Dates affected: 05/21/20 - 02/10/21

Describe the issue: From May 21, 2020 through May 26, 2020, we briefly captured Mississippi's Positive antibody tests (specimens) through state press conferences. After May 26, 2020, Mississippi no longer reported new data for this metric and we carried it over. On February 11, 2021, we cleared Mississippi's Positive antibody tests (specimens) timeseries to ensure that our data is as accurate and consistent as possible.

Comments

hmhoffman commented on February 10, 2021, 9:23 PM PST
Open in Github

Rows edited: 265 MS 2021-02-09 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-02-08 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-02-07 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-02-06 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-02-05 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-02-04 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-02-03 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-02-02 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-02-01 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-01-31 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-01-30 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-01-29 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-01-28 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-01-27 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-01-26 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-01-25 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-01-24 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-01-23 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-01-22 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-01-21 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-01-20 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-01-19 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-01-18 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-01-17 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-01-16 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-01-15 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-01-14 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-01-13 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-01-12 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-01-11 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-01-10 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-01-09 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-01-08 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-01-07 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-01-06 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-01-05 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-01-04 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-01-03 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-01-02 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2021-01-01 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-12-31 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-12-30 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-12-29 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-12-28 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-12-27 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-12-26 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-12-25 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-12-24 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-12-23 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-12-22 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-12-21 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-12-20 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-12-19 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-12-18 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-12-17 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-12-16 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-12-15 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-12-14 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-12-13 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-12-12 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-12-11 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-12-10 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-12-09 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-12-08 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-12-07 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-12-06 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-12-05 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-12-04 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-12-03 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-12-02 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-12-01 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-11-30 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-11-29 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-11-28 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-11-27 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-11-26 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-11-25 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-11-24 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-11-23 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-11-22 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-11-21 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-11-20 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-11-19 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-11-18 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-11-17 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-11-16 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-11-15 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-11-14 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-11-13 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-11-12 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-11-11 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-11-10 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-11-09 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-11-08 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-11-07 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-11-06 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-11-05 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-11-04 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-11-03 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-11-02 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-11-01 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-10-31 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-10-30 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-10-29 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-10-28 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-10-27 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-10-26 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-10-25 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-10-24 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-10-23 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-10-22 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-10-21 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-10-20 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-10-19 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-10-18 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-10-17 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-10-16 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-10-15 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-10-14 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-10-13 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-10-12 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-10-11 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-10-10 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-10-09 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-10-08 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-10-07 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-10-06 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-10-05 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-10-04 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-10-03 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-10-02 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-10-01 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-09-30 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-09-29 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-09-28 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-09-27 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-09-26 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-09-25 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-09-24 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-09-23 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-09-22 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-09-21 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-09-20 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-09-19 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-09-18 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-09-17 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-09-16 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-09-15 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-09-14 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-09-13 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-09-12 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-09-11 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-09-10 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-09-09 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-09-08 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-09-07 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-09-06 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-09-05 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-09-04 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-09-03 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-09-02 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-09-01 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-08-31 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-08-30 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-08-29 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-08-28 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-08-27 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-08-26 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-08-25 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-08-24 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-08-23 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-08-22 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-08-21 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-08-20 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-08-19 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-08-18 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-08-17 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-08-16 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-08-15 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-08-14 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-08-13 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-08-12 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-08-11 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-08-10 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-08-09 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-08-08 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-08-07 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-08-06 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-08-05 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-08-04 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-08-03 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-08-02 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-08-01 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-07-31 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-07-30 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-07-29 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-07-28 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-07-27 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-07-26 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-07-25 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-07-24 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-07-23 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-07-22 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-07-21 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-07-20 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-07-19 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-07-18 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-07-17 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-07-16 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-07-15 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-07-14 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-07-13 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-07-12 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-07-11 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-07-10 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-07-09 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-07-08 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-07-07 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-07-06 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-07-05 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-07-04 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-07-03 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-07-02 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-07-01 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-06-30 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-06-29 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-06-28 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-06-27 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-06-26 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-06-25 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-06-24 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-06-23 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-06-22 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-06-21 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-06-20 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-06-19 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-06-18 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-06-17 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-06-16 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-06-15 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-06-14 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-06-13 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-06-12 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-06-11 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-06-10 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-06-09 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-06-08 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-06-07 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-06-06 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-06-05 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-06-04 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-06-03 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-06-02 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-06-01 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-05-31 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-05-30 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-05-29 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-05-28 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-05-27 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-05-26 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 95) MS 2020-05-25 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 80) MS 2020-05-24 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 80) MS 2020-05-23 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 80) MS 2020-05-22 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 80) MS 2020-05-21 positiveTestsAntibody: None (was 80)

#1055: [MS] Patch 01/07 late update

Issue number 1055

hmhoffman opened this issue on January 8, 2021, 1:51 PM PST

Open in Github

State: MS

Dates affected: 01/07

Describe the issue: On January 7, 2021, the Mississippi website was down for a portion of the day due to technical problems, and we could not access their data by the time of our daily update.

Comments

hmhoffman commented on January 8, 2021, 2:05 PM PST
Open in Github

Rows edited: 1 MS 2021-01-07 positive: 231490 (was 228235) death: 5061 (was 5013) deathConfirmed: 3938 (was 3920) deathProbable: 1123 (was 1093) probableCases: 77146 (was 75329) positiveCasesViral: 154334 (was 152906) lastUpdateTime: 2021-01-06 05:00:00+00:00 (was 2021-01-05 05:00:00+00:00) dateChecked: 2021-01-08 22:00:00+00:00 (was 2021-01-08 00:28:00+00:00)

#1055: [MS] Patch 01/07 late update

Issue number 1055

hmhoffman opened this issue on January 8, 2021, 1:51 PM PST

Open in Github

State: MS

Dates affected: 01/07

Describe the issue: On January 7, 2021, the Mississippi website was down for a portion of the day due to technical problems, and we could not access their data by the time of our daily update.

Comments

hmhoffman commented on January 8, 2021, 2:05 PM PST
Open in Github

Rows edited: 1 MS 2021-01-07 positive: 231490 (was 228235) death: 5061 (was 5013) deathConfirmed: 3938 (was 3920) deathProbable: 1123 (was 1093) probableCases: 77146 (was 75329) positiveCasesViral: 154334 (was 152906) lastUpdateTime: 2021-01-06 05:00:00+00:00 (was 2021-01-05 05:00:00+00:00) dateChecked: 2021-01-08 22:00:00+00:00 (was 2021-01-08 00:28:00+00:00)

#944: [MS] Patch 11/8 Cur. hosp, cur. icu, and cur. vent

Issue number 944

hmhoffman opened this issue on November 10, 2020, 10:09 AM PST

Open in Github

State: MS

Dates affected: 11/8

Describe the issue: On 11/8, MS current hospitalization values updated after we checked the state. We need to backfill cur. hosp, cur. icu, and cur. vent using the hover over graph on their page (note: MS reports hospitalizations on a one day lag.

Comments

hmhoffman commented on November 10, 2020, 10:12 AM PST
Open in Github

BEFORE: Screen Shot 2020-11-10 at 1 11 57 PM

AFTER: Screen Shot 2020-11-10 at 1 12 49 PM

#870: [MS] Missing value for Total Tests (PCR) on 5/17

Issue number 870

jaclyde opened this issue on September 27, 2020, 6:04 PM PDT

Labels Data quality Historical Data Missing Data

Open in Github

State: Mississippi

Problem: We were missing the Total Tests (PCR) value for 5/17. Using the screenshot from 5/17 backfilled the value.

Screenshot: https://covid-tracking-project-data.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/state_screenshots/MS/MS-20200517-184033.png

BEFORE: Screen Shot 2020-09-27 at 6 02 30 PM

AFTER: Screen Shot 2020-09-27 at 6 02 53 PM

Comments

#846: [MS] Probables Backfill and Confirmed Cases Corrections

Issue number 846

jesseandersonumd opened this issue on September 18, 2020, 7:06 AM PDT

Labels Backfill Data quality Historical Data stale

Open in Github

State or US: MS

Describe the problem As explained by this previous github issue [https://github.com/COVID19Tracking/issues/issues/712] we reported positive (PCR) cases from 4/30-6/01, though it wasn't clear whether the reported cases value represented confirmed cases exclusively. We will delete values in the positive PCR confirmed column prior to 6/1, after which both CTP and MS started separating confirmed and probable cases on their main state page according to screenshots. [https://covidtracking.com/screenshots/MS/MS-20200602-123808.png] We will also backfill probables using the formula positives - positive PCR confirmed from 6/02 - 7/28 (which is when CTP first started reporting probables) and cross-referencing with screenshots.

We will also correct the value on 6/19 for positive cases PCR, which was 20641 when it should've been 20500 because we needed to carry over this value from 6/17 - MS stopped separating confirmed and probables between 6/17-6/21. We will also correct the value on 6/3 for positive cases PCR, which was 16211 according to screenshots [https://covidtracking.com/screenshots/MS/MS-20200603-124214.png] but reported as 15910. We will also correct the value on 6/14 for positive cases PCR, which was reported as 19216 when it should've been 19383 [https://covidtracking.com/screenshots/MS/MS-20200614-124313.png].

Link to data source

  • https://covidtracking.com/screenshots/MS/MS-20200602-123808.png
  • https://msdh.ms.gov/msdhsite/_static/14,0,420.html

Comments

jesseandersonumd commented on September 18, 2020, 7:11 AM PDT
Open in Github

CORRECTING VALUE ON 6/19 - BEFORE:

Screen Shot 2020-09-18 at 10 11 28 AM

jesseandersonumd commented on September 18, 2020, 7:12 AM PDT
Open in Github

CORRECTING VALUE ON 6/19 - AFTER: Screen Shot 2020-09-18 at 10 12 09 AM

jesseandersonumd commented on September 18, 2020, 7:14 AM PDT
Open in Github

CORRECTING CONFIRMED VALUES 4/30-6/1 - BEFORE:

Screen Shot 2020-09-18 at 10 14 05 AM

jesseandersonumd commented on September 18, 2020, 7:15 AM PDT
Open in Github

CORRECTING CONFIRMED VALUES 4/30-6/1 - AFTER: Screen Shot 2020-09-18 at 10 14 57 AM

jesseandersonumd commented on September 18, 2020, 7:21 AM PDT
Open in Github

MISTAKE CORRECTION 6/3 POSITIVE CASES PCR - BEFORE:

Screen Shot 2020-09-18 at 10 20 39 AM

jesseandersonumd commented on September 18, 2020, 7:21 AM PDT
Open in Github

MISTAKE CORRECTION 6/3 POSITIVE CASES PCR - AFTER:

Screen Shot 2020-09-18 at 10 20 53 AM

jesseandersonumd commented on September 18, 2020, 7:34 AM PDT
Open in Github

PROBABES (BEFORE): Screen Shot 2020-09-18 at 10 34 01 AM

jesseandersonumd commented on September 18, 2020, 7:35 AM PDT
Open in Github

PROBABLES (AFTER): Screen Shot 2020-09-18 at 10 34 18 AM

esquared commented on September 24, 2020, 8:39 PM PDT
Open in Github

MISTAKE CORRECTION 6/14 POSITIVE CASES PCR AND PROBABLES- BEFORE:Screen Shot 2020-09-24 at 10 34 31 PM Before

esquared commented on September 24, 2020, 8:40 PM PDT
Open in Github

MISTAKE CORRECTION 6/14 POSITIVE CASES PCR AND PROBABLES- AFTER: Screen Shot 2020-09-24 at 10 35 04 PM After

esquared commented on October 1, 2020, 10:06 AM PDT
Open in Github

Before and after values

Probable Timeseries Backfill MS.xlsx

stale[bot] commented on October 16, 2020, 10:53 AM PDT
Open in Github

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions!

stale[bot] commented on October 26, 2020, 11:55 AM PDT
Open in Github

This issue has been closed because it was stale for 15 days, and there was no further activity on it for 10 days. You can feel free to re-open it if the issue is important, and label it as "not stale."

#825: [MS] Backfill Cur. Hosp, Cur. icu from 8/24-9/10. Delete cur. vent from 8/30 - 9/10

Issue number 825

hmhoffman opened this issue on September 11, 2020, 2:17 PM PDT

Labels Backfill Historical Data not stale

Open in Github

State: MS Dates impacted: 8/24 - 9/10 Issue described: On 8/24 MS switched current hospitalization and icu sources and stoped reporting cur. vent. They resumed reporting this on 9/15. We need to backfill current hospitalizations, cur. icu, and cur. vent for 8/24 - 9/14 from the "Hospitalizations and ICU Use (Statewide)" graph Sources: https://covid-tracking.slack.com/archives/CUQ4MMTPD/p1600201831431600 https://covid-tracking.slack.com/archives/CUQ4MMTPD/p1599857074458900, https://msdh.ms.gov/msdhsite/_static/14,21994,420,873.html

Comments

stale[bot] commented on September 30, 2020, 2:17 PM PDT
Open in Github

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions!

stale[bot] commented on October 10, 2020, 2:24 PM PDT
Open in Github

This issue has been closed because it was stale for 15 days, and there was no further activity on it for 10 days. You can feel free to re-open it if the issue is important, and label it as "not stale."

muamichali commented on April 6, 2021, 2:14 PM PDT
Open in Github

image

#712: [MS] Historical PCL Cases

Issue number 712

jesseandersonumd opened this issue on July 31, 2020, 7:40 AM PDT

Labels Data quality Historical Data stale

Open in Github

State: MS

Dates impacted: 4/30-6/01

Issue: On 6/02, MS started separating out confirmed and probable cases. From 4/30-6/01, we were reporting the same value in positive cases (PCR) and positive cases (people, probable and confirmed). No outreach was done prior to 6/02 to confirm that "total cases", which was the value that we used for both columns, was lab-confirmed only. This is why I propose deleting all values in the positive cases (PCR) column prior to 6/02 and only use the confirmed values for the positive cases (PCR) column that appeared on the state website on 6/02.

Comments

stale[bot] commented on August 15, 2020, 8:13 AM PDT
Open in Github

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions!

stale[bot] commented on August 25, 2020, 10:16 AM PDT
Open in Github

This issue has been closed because it was stale for 15 days, and there was no further activity on it for 10 days. You can feel free to re-open it if the issue is important, and label it as "not stale."

#643: [MS] Negatives dropped on 7/8

Issue number 643

MattHilliard opened this issue on July 17, 2020, 3:58 PM PDT

Labels Data quality

Open in Github

State or US: MS

Describe the problem MS did not provide updated total testing numbers between 7/6 and 7/8. Because we subtract total tests from confirmed cases to yield negatives, negatives needed to be carried over to avoid going down. This happened on 7/7, but on 7/8 the negatives number was recalculated, resulting in an apparent decline in total tests on the web site. There was no public note to explain the decrease and it wasn't mentioned in the DE conversation for MS that day, so I assume it was unintentional.

(This was reported to us via email.)

Comments

MattHilliard commented on July 17, 2020, 3:59 PM PDT
Open in Github

Before: image

After: image

#586: [MS] data entry mistake from 7/8

Issue number 586

muamichali opened this issue on July 8, 2020, 1:21 PM PDT

Labels Data quality

Open in Github

State or US: MS

Describe the problem In the "Total Tests (PCR)" column, it seems that the last checker recorded the total tests number that lumps PCR and antibody tests instead of recording just the total PCR tests number. I'm changing it to just total PCR tests, so the number is lower. https://covid-tracking.slack.com/archives/CUQ4MMTPD/p1594239073454000?thread_ts=1594238963.452000&cid=CUQ4MMTPD

Link to data source

Comments

qpmnguyen commented on July 8, 2020, 2:19 PM PDT
Open in Github

Before: image After: image Since total tests did not change from 7/6 to 7/7, carrying over negatives from 7/6

#563: [MS] 6/30 total test numbers were used instead of PCR tests only

Issue number 563

muamichali opened this issue on July 1, 2020, 1:04 PM PDT

Labels Data quality

Open in Github

State or US: MS

Describe the problem 6/30 total test numbers were used instead of PCR tests only

Link to data source https://covid-tracking-project-data.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/state_screenshots/MS/MS-20200630-184210.png

Comments

brianskli commented on July 1, 2020, 1:11 PM PDT
Open in Github

Thank you! Our records displayed an incorrect value (299511) for MS' PCR testing totals on 6/30. This has been updated to reflect the correct number (287546) for 6/30 PCR totals by means of a screenshot of MS' website. MS 6:30 Before MS 6:30 After

#535: [MS] Total Tests (PCR) and Negative Cases were entered incorrectly on 6/23

Issue number 535

qpmnguyen opened this issue on June 25, 2020, 8:24 AM PDT

Labels Data quality Historical Data stale

Open in Github

State or US: MS

Describe the problem Data entry mistake lumping antibody tests into total tests (PCR) number. Mistake was propagated to negative calculations as well Before screenshot image

Link to data source Screenshot 6/23: https://covidtracking.com/screenshots/MS/MS-20200623-184044.png

Comments

qpmnguyen commented on June 25, 2020, 8:26 AM PDT
Open in Github

Correcting: Since total tests did not change from 6/22, going to re-update negatives to be the same as 6/22. Updating Total Tests (PCR) to be the same as well. After screenshot image

stale[bot] commented on July 10, 2020, 8:34 AM PDT
Open in Github

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions!

#469: [MS Historicals]antibody tests were added to total for one day

Issue number 469

muamichali opened this issue on May 31, 2020, 11:14 AM PDT

Labels Historical Data stale

Open in Github

In the Mississippi date you accidentally counted the antibody tests for the 5/29. So it was high number. Then for 5/30 it was corrected, but it made the new test numbers be a negative number. And perhaps on 5/27 as well when it says there were 313 tests but 273 positive cases.

Front logo Front conversations

Comments

stale[bot] commented on June 15, 2020, 11:15 AM PDT
Open in Github

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions!

stale[bot] commented on June 25, 2020, 11:32 AM PDT
Open in Github

This issue has been closed because it was stale for 15 days, and there was no further activity on it for 10 days. You can feel free to re-open it if the issue is important, and label it as "not stale."

#350: [MS - Mississippi] Update "current hospitalized" for 5/2 datapoint

Issue number 350

camille-le opened this issue on May 3, 2020, 2:32 PM PDT

Open in Github

Hello, requesting an update for "Currently Hospitalized" for Mississippi for 5/2.

CURRENTLY:

  • For 5/2, we recorded 424+28 = 452 for Currently Hospitalized.

REQUESTED CHANGE:

  • Based on the time series below, this should be changed from 452 to 632 (424+208) for 5/2.

currHosp_05-02 Source

Please note, MS's data is reported from the previous day. So for 5/2, this would reflect data from 5/1. This is why the chart shows the data for 5/1.

From the MS page: This map and the following table show total cases in Mississippi as of 6 p.m. May 2, 2020, and include all reported cases since March 11, 2020.

Thank you! Camille

Comments

muamichali commented on May 3, 2020, 2:41 PM PDT
Open in Github

Hi Camille! I am updating this right now.

BEFORE Screenshot_2020-05-03 Coronavirus numbers by state (CovidTracking, DEV COPY)(2)

AFTER Screenshot_2020-05-03 Coronavirus numbers by state (CovidTracking, DEV COPY)(3)

#244: MS has an B grade with wild swings

Issue number 244

Jmuccigr opened this issue on April 21, 2020, 2:23 AM PDT

Labels State grades

Open in Github

MS seems pretty clearly to be reporting on a weekly basis with giant spikes on Mondays. That would seem to mean that they are reporting neither positive nor negative cases reliably.

Comments

muamichali commented on April 21, 2020, 10:02 AM PDT
Open in Github

Thank you for this information @Jmuccigr

We will take your input into consideration when compiling the states grades.

#130: MS: Governor reporting much higher test numbers

Issue number 130

Jmuccigr opened this issue on April 3, 2020, 2:29 AM PDT

Labels stale

Open in Github

The governor of Mississippi was on Twitter today bragging on their testing stats. He says:

Mississippi has done 16,662 total tests. We have 1,177 cases. Our population is a little less than three million.

That positive count agrees with the database, but his test count is three times higher.

Looking at it, I'm also not sure where the project's test numbers are coming from. The webpage for the MS health dept reports only their tests and has a positive rate of 10% or so. (I don't see any info on private tests on their pages.) It also says they've done 5,257 tests. Together therefore they account for about half of cases, but nearly 90% of tests in the project. That seems off.

If their pos rate persists in private testing, it would suggest roughly 5,000 private tests have been done, for a total test count of around 10k. That's a lot lower than the governor's claim of 16k, but maybe private companies are testing a different population. His claim seems closer than the project's 5,900 count.

In any case, something's inconsistent here.

Source: https://twitter.com/tatereeves/status/1245843019745673217

Comments

muamichali commented on April 4, 2020, 9:19 AM PDT
Open in Github

@Jmuccigr Thank you for this information.

The governor is indeed reporting 16,662 tests, however tests do not equal number of individuals tested. which is what we are tracking.

For testing data (positives and negatives) in MS, our project is using the numbers provided by the state on https://msdh.ms.gov/msdhsite/_static/14,0,420.html. You are absolutely correct that they are only reporting tests from MPHL.

Please urge MS to provide the number of individuals tested, and positive from private sources so we can expand our reporting data.

Jmuccigr commented on April 4, 2020, 9:42 AM PDT
Open in Github

Thanks for the reply. Yes, I get the distinction, but you'll see that further on in the thread the governor compares that number to the "residents tested" in South Korea, so he is implying that that figure is people tested, not simply tests. Unless he's just trying to be deceptive.

Would a 3:1 ratio of tests to persons tested not be a bit high?

To the second point, since the website gives only the public tests, where is the rest of the count coming from? Again, the public positive rate would suggest a lot more private tests than are listed.

stale[bot] commented on May 4, 2020, 6:20 PM PDT
Open in Github

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions!

stale[bot] commented on May 14, 2020, 7:30 PM PDT
Open in Github

This issue has been closed because it was stale for 15 days, and there was no further activity on it for 10 days. You can feel free to re-open it if the issue is important, and label it as "not stale."