US Virgin Islands

Changes-2.txt

Changes-2.txt

Changes - VI.txt

Changes - VI.txt

We are adding the breakdown for confirmed/probable from 5/15 onward because before then they were not reported on the website and do not sum CO after.txt CO Before.txt

Changes (7).txt

[ ND.xlsx ](url)

Changes (1).txt

BEFORE:

AFTER:

BEFORE

AFTER

WS2

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions!

This issue has been closed because it was stale for 15 days, and there was no further activity on it for 10 days. You can feel free to re-open it if the issue is important, and label it as "not stale."

Action taken: Private note updated Before: After:

Values in Confirmed Cases (PCR) cleared Before: After:

Pop-ups changed Before: After:

Before: No values After 2020-07-03__CTP_ID_Update.xlsx

Hey @muamichali, I took a look at Idaho's Tableau dashboard and exported data from the Hospitalizations tab. Attached is a spreadsheet with a proposed update - please see "CTP_Update" tab: 2020-07-03__CTP_ID_Update.xlsx

Can you please review before we make an update for 2020-03-26 to 2020-06-28 for In ICU – Currently and Hospitalized – Currently?

Thanks! Camille

Link to Data Source(s):

• ICU: "Number of hospitalized and ICU with confirmed COVID-19" C_in_ICU_Full_Data_data.xlsx
• Hospitalizaitons: "Patients currently hospitalized in an inpatient bed who have suspected or confirmed COVID-19" S_and_C_Hospitalized_Full_Data_data.xlsx

Update - closing this ticket and moving to double-check.

Hi @JustOneGuyHere

Please see the CDC Data tracker here https://www.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/index.html

Currently 65,735 deaths are reported on the page.

Thanks, censor.

On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 6:35 PM Michal Mart notifications@github.com wrote:

Closed #352 https://github.com/COVID19Tracking/issues/issues/352.

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/COVID19Tracking/issues/issues/352#event-3298064864, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/APOCEYR7QRRQTI7T4VA4XO3RPYLWJANCNFSM4MYLPALA .

Both numbers are defensible. The difference is primarily attributable to the way New York City and New York State differ in tracking deaths.

See: https://twitter.com/COVID19Tracking/status/1254161668671541248?s=20

We anticipate New York State will incorporate probable deaths soon, as will we, though maintaining our laboratory-confirmed number in the states where it is possible.

Alexis

On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 11:19 AM Fyjimojo notifications@github.com wrote:

Hello. I have been tracking COVID-19 on worldometers.info/coronavirus since mid-March.

You report U.S. deaths at 52,525 as of yesterday.

Yesterday, worldometers.info/coronavirus reported 57,862.

Which number is correct?

Thank you!

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/COVID19Tracking/issues/issues/331, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACS7NYKMDY22MCN7SKGJ76DRPBVUBANCNFSM4MT6SUNQ .

-- Alexis Madrigal Staff Writer | The Atlantic Co-Founder | The Atlantic's COVID Tracking Project, covidtracking.com m. 415 602 4953

This can't explain the entire difference for US total deaths, which as of this morning is approximately 6,000.

Agree. Changed.

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions!

Thank you for the request @riccardograziani I will pass it on to the race data team.

I also wanted to let you know that we launched the new Covid Racial Data Tracker and homepage today https://covidtracking.com/race

Thanks very much for your response!

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions!

This issue has been closed because it was stale for 15 days, and there was no further activity on it for 10 days. You can feel free to re-open it if the issue is important, and label it as "not stale."

Thanks for reporting this issue @mlgnight!

If you scroll down to the top of the page, we publish notes that explain these kinds of issues if we know about them. In this case, it was a data revision by the state (4/19/20) are lower than yesterday. Data cleaning that occurred late on 4/18 removed 190 confirmed cases that were discovered to be out of state residents.

I was just checking WA state data and comparing to yours. I'm sure they won't perfectly line up since the WA state data is probably cleaned/edited from time to time for various reasons (adding/subtracting cases due to data entry errors, or like this one where some individuals were from out of state). I just wanted to make sure that this is to be expected (e.g. once your data is finalized for a particular date, it isn't updated. It might be nice to have a separate tracking database that does automatically update as states update there data. I also checked against the usafact.org dataset, and found similar discrepancies form the official WA state count. Either way, thank you so much for your work!

@jstover79 You are very welcome. If you find data that we need to update and report it here as new issue with state sources, we will do our best to correct historical data.

@mlgnight Thank you for reporting. There was an earlier issue https://github.com/COVID19Tracking/issues/issues/217 and the data has been patched. It should be reflected on the site this afternoon around 5.30pm EST.

This doesn't really explain CA's weird ups and downs, but more significantly, the total tests numbers on their data page are clearly rounded. Every day's total ends in -00. Your counts don't match theirs all the time, but they do right now.

Of course you have to use what the states report, but it really would be good to get to the bottom of what's going on with CA's reporting.

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions!

This issue has been closed because it was stale for 15 days, and there was no further activity on it for 10 days. You can feel free to re-open it if the issue is important, and label it as "not stale."

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions!

This issue has been closed because it was stale for 15 days, and there was no further activity on it for 10 days. You can feel free to re-open it if the issue is important, and label it as "not stale."

Note: Deleted earlier comment advocating focus on cumulative hospitalizations.

The weight of reporting by states is increasingly tilted toward currently hospitalized, so it might make more sense to fill that out. It is also more directly tied to capacity management.

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions!

This issue has been closed because it was stale for 15 days, and there was no further activity on it for 10 days. You can feel free to re-open it if the issue is important, and label it as "not stale."

Updated numbers are posted to https://www.michigan.gov/coronavirus/0,9753,7-406-98163_98173---,00.html

Cumulative Number of Specimens Tested for COVID-19 - Last Updated 4/2/2020 14:45

Notes

Notes: This is a new reporting system and additional laboratories will be included over time. Counts of specimens tested positive will not equal number of people with COVID-19. People may have more than one test or may have had their test from an out of state lab. Total samples tested includes test that were negative, positive, and inconclusive. Commercial labs only includes data from LabCorp. Public health labs include the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services Bureau of Laboratories. Counts represent the total specimens tested, not total patients tested. A patient can have more than one specimen tested, therefore the number of specimens tested may be more than the number of patients tested.

Michigan negative counts were not updated "Last updated: 4/02 11:00 ET"

Those counts are for specimens. I did update with even more accurate data. See issue #173

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions!

This issue has been closed because it was stale for 15 days, and there was no further activity on it for 10 days. You can feel free to re-open it if the issue is important, and label it as "not stale."