Published data
Batches
Batch #941
Published on March 5, 2021, 6:00 PM PST
We were previously calcaulating Negative (People or Cases) in New Mexico because our system relied on adding positive+negative to get total tests. Since this is no longer the case, we are removing the calculated negatives timeseries.
Batch #705
Published on December 27, 2020, 11:17 AM PST
We used to store New Mexico cases in the Positive Cases (PCR) field because New Mexico calls them "Positive test results" on their website. However, there is no indication anywhere on the website, nor in our outreach to the state, that clarifies that these positives are PCR only. Moreover, reports such as KHN's have implied that New Mexico includes individuals with positive antigen tests in the figure. On December 27, 2020 we are clearing the Positive Cases (PCR) history to reflect that there is no evidence for this classification.
Batch #570
Published on November 18, 2020, 2:31 PM PST
Shift time series by 1-day to match state reporting dates.
Batch #313
Published on September 23, 2020, 7:44 AM PDT
New Mexico clarified that they report in tests, not unique people. This shifts their time series to the correct column.
Batch #72
Published on August 12, 2020, 11:46 AM PDT
backfill
Batch #-594
Published on August 9, 2020, 6:03 PM PDT
Updating 5800 rows for AK, AL, AR, AS, AZ, CA, CO, CT, DC, DE, FL, GA, GU, HI, IA, ID, IL, IN, KS, KY, LA, MA, MD, ME, MI, MN, MO, MP, MS, MT, NC, ND, NE, NH, NJ, NM, NV, NY, OH, OK, OR, PA, PR, RI, SC, SD, TN, TX, UT, VA, VI, VT, WA, WI, WV, WY
Batch #-595
Published on August 9, 2020, 5:07 PM PDT
Updating 5827 rows for AK, AL, AR, AS, AZ, CA, CO, CT, DC, DE, FL, GA, GU, HI, IA, ID, IL, IN, KS, KY, LA, MA, MD, ME, MI, MN, MO, MP, MS, MT, NC, ND, NE, NH, NJ, NM, NV, NY, OH, OK, OR, PA, PR, RI, SC, SD, TN, TX, UT, VA, VI, VT, WA, WI, WV, WY
Batch #-718
Published on July 6, 2020, 4:02 PM PDT
Daily update for 20200706